|
The Most Trusted Voice in Dot-Com Criticism
|
| Home Reviews Generator About |
Founders FundFirm Information
Name: Founders Fund
URL: foundersfund.com
Founded: 2005
AUM: $11B+
Type: Venture Capital
The ` Performance-wise, this is a Lighthouse score that would make a Series A pitch deck blush with shame. The homepage loads a 3.2MB hero video that autoplays on mobile (RIP to anyone on a metered connection), while the actual portfolio companies are loaded via a client-side API call that returns a 400KB JSON blob. It's the digital equivalent of the Dutch East India Company's accounting books – technically functional but wildly inefficient. The Largest Contentful Paint clocks in around 4.8 seconds on a fast connection, which means potential LPs are staring at a blank white screen longer than most startups survive their first investor meeting. Meanwhile, their `/api/portfolio` endpoint appears to be hitting a database directly with zero caching headers, because why optimize when you can just throw more AWS instances at the problem? The irony deepens when you examine their tracking setup: 23 different third-party scripts, including HubSpot, Segment, Google Tag Manager, and what appears to be a custom analytics solution that phones home to `metrics.foundersfund.internal`. For a firm that's invested in privacy-focused companies and regularly pontificates about surveillance capitalism, they're running more trackers than a Black Friday e-commerce site. The Content Security Policy is essentially non-existent – just `default-src: *` like they're actively inviting XSS attacks. It's the venture capital equivalent of the 19th-century whaling ships that hunted sperm whales to fuel oil lamps while their own vessels leaked by moonlight. The `robots.txt` file is a single line: "User-agent: *", which either shows supreme confidence or complete ignorance of how search engines work. Navigation feels like it was designed by someone who's never actually used a website – the mobile hamburger menu requires two taps to open (thanks to a race condition in their event handlers), and the portfolio filtering system breaks entirely if you select more than three categories simultaneously. The infamous "thesis" page loads via a route that suggests they're using React Router, but the actual implementation spawns a new `XMLHttpRequest` for each thesis point, creating a waterfall effect that would make a frontend engineer weep. Their team photos are served at full 4K resolution (2.1MB each) then scaled down via CSS, because apparently no one at this $11B fund has heard of responsive images or the ` The DNS setup reveals they're running on Cloudflare (smart) but with all the performance optimizations disabled (less smart), suggesting someone read exactly one Medium article about CDNs and called it a day. The SSL certificate is properly configured, though the HSTS header is missing, and there's a curious redirect chain that bounces through `www.foundersfund.com` → `foundersfund.com` → `foundersfund.com/home` before landing on the actual homepage. It's like watching Cornelius Vanderbilt build a railroad that technically gets you from point A to point B, but only after stopping at seven unnecessary stations and requiring passengers to change trains twice. The footer contains a copyright notice from 2019, which either indicates they haven't touched this code in years or they're so focused on "10x-ing the future" that they forgot how to update a simple date string.
VERDICT: A technically functional monument to the fundamental disconnect between Silicon Valley's "move fast and break things" philosophy and the basic competency expected of a firm managing eleven billion dollars – it's fast alright, fast at breaking web standards.
|
|
© 1999-2026 DOTFORK. All rights reserved. Last updated: January 12, 2026 |