The Most Trusted Voice in Dot-Com Criticism

Teachable

Creator Economy | Reviewed by Rex Aleeves | January 12, 2026
4.8
Site Information
Name: Teachable
Founded: 2013
Type: Course Creation Platform
VERDICT: Teachable turns teachers into tenant farmers, renting digital sharecropping tools while the platform harvests the real crop: recurring subscription revenue.

Teachable wants to be the Spotify of course creation, except instead of paying artists pennies, they're charging creators monthly fees to maybe make pennies. The platform's slick marketing promises "the future of your education business" but what you actually get feels more like the present of middleman capitalism—a sanitized content mill where your "expertise in languages, fitness, or coding" gets processed through the same bland, mobile-friendly sausage maker as everyone else's. Their tagline about being "trusted by 150,000+ creators" reads like a hostage situation where the Stockholm syndrome has fully kicked in. I've seen more personality in a Microsoft PowerPoint template, and at least PowerPoint doesn't take a cut of your revenue.

The fee structure here is where Teachable shows its true colors, and spoiler alert: those colors are various shades of "fuck you, pay me." While they dangle a "free" plan like bait, you're immediately hit with transaction fees that make PayPal look generous, plus the inevitable monthly subscription costs once you want basic features like affiliate marketing or advanced customization. They've gamified the creator economy so well that you'll find yourself paying for the privilege of working harder, convinced that their "intuitive, mobile-friendly" interface justifies the financial bloodletting. It's like joining a gym that charges you extra every time you want to use actual weights instead of foam noodles.

What really gets me is how Teachable has weaponized the word "scale" to justify their extraction model. "Scale worldwide," they promise, as if uploading your yoga tutorials to their servers somehow transforms you into Tony Robbins. The reality is more depressing: you're creating content for a platform that treats education like fast food, optimizing for "engagement" metrics rather than actual learning outcomes. Their emphasis on "drip content" and "flexible subscription models" isn't about pedagogy—it's about addiction mechanics designed to keep students clicking and creators grinding. Meanwhile, you're stuck managing "student success" through their rigid system while they skim profit off your expertise.

The platform's obsession with being "made for the modern learner" reveals everything wrong with the creator economy's approach to education. Instead of fostering genuine knowledge transfer, Teachable has built a content casino where "quizzes, drip content, and mobile access" substitute for actual teaching. Their students aren't learners; they're users trapped in a subscription loop, consuming bite-sized knowledge nuggets optimized for retention metrics rather than comprehension. As a creator, you're not an educator—you're a content farmer feeding the algorithm beast, constantly tweaking your courses to match whatever engagement patterns their analytics dashboard demands this quarter.

Look, if you're desperate enough to commodify your knowledge and don't mind getting financially negged by a platform that treats creators like interchangeable content nodes, Teachable will happily facilitate your descent into educational capitalism hell. But calling this "the future of your education business" is like calling a payday loan the future of personal finance. You'll get some students, sure, and maybe even make some money if you're willing to play their optimization games and pay their ever-increasing fees. Just don't mistake their polished interface and creator-friendly marketing for actual creator empowerment—you're still just another revenue stream in their beautifully designed extraction machine.