The Most Trusted Voice in Dot-Com Criticism

Planetscale

Database | Reviewed by Rex Aleeves | January 11, 2026
6.6
Site Information
Name: Planetscale
Founded: 2018
Type: Serverless MySQL
VERDICT: Competent database technology cosplaying as the second coming of data storage innovation.

PlanetScale claims to offer "the world's fastest and most scalable cloud hosting" and brother, that's like declaring your garage band the next Beatles before you've even tuned your instruments. I've seen this rodeo before – every database startup thinks they've cracked the code of infinite scale, usually by slapping some buzzwords on existing tech and calling it revolutionary. The whole pitch reeks of that specific Silicon Valley delusion where taking something that already works (in this case, YouTube's Vitess) and wrapping it in enterprise marketing speak somehow makes you a visionary. But here's the thing: beneath all the breathless marketing copy about "blazing fast NVMe drives" and "unlimited IOPS," there might actually be something decent here, buried under layers of corporate word salad.

The technical foundation isn't complete bullshit, which honestly surprised me. Vitess has legitimate street cred – YouTube built it to handle petabytes across 70,000 nodes, and that's not marketing fluff, that's actual engineering solving actual problems. The horizontal sharding story makes sense if you're operating at YouTube scale, but here's where PlanetScale gets weird: they're trying to sell enterprise-grade database architecture to companies that probably don't need it. It's like selling Formula 1 cars to people who just need to get groceries. The Postgres addition feels tacked on, like they realized not everyone wants to deal with MySQL's quirks but couldn't commit to abandoning their Vitess heritage. Their "shared nothing architecture" sounds impressive until you realize most companies would be fine with a well-configured traditional database and better caching.

The website design screams "we hired the same agency as everyone else" – clean, sterile, optimized for conversion rather than conveying any actual personality. Those testimonials feel cherry-picked to an almost comical degree, and the conspicuous absence of pricing information tells you everything you need to know about their target market. They want you to "contact sales" which is database startup speak for "we're going to quote you whatever we think we can get away with." The security and compliance promises are standard issue enterprise bingo, hitting all the right notes without saying anything particularly compelling. It's competent in that soulless, focus-grouped way that makes me miss the days when tech companies had actual opinions about things.

What bothers me most is the disconnect between the grandiose claims and the actual user experience they're promising. "Data center performance to the cloud" is meaningless marketing poetry – the cloud IS data centers, just someone else's. Their feature breakdown reads like a checklist designed by committee, touching on Performance, Uptime, Cost, Security, Features without diving deep enough into any one area to convince me they've thought beyond the obvious talking points. The Sualeh Asif quote feels obligatory rather than enthusiastic, like someone fulfilled a favor rather than genuinely endorsing the product. For a company built on YouTube's technology, they sure don't seem to understand that authenticity matters more than polished messaging.

Credit where it's due: if you actually need horizontal database sharding and have exhausted simpler solutions, PlanetScale probably won't actively hurt you. The underlying Vitess technology has proven itself at scale, and their managed service approach means you don't have to become a database operations expert overnight. But the gap between their marketing promises and the reality of what most companies need feels deliberately obfuscated. They're solving real problems for a narrow slice of companies while marketing themselves as the solution for everyone. It's decent technology wrapped in inflated promises, which puts it squarely in that frustrating middle ground where it's neither revolutionary enough to get excited about nor terrible enough to dismiss outright.